Find a Lawyer

FARMAISH ABBAS versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 337A (i), F (vi) Guarantee, the name of the further investigating suspect was not named in the FIR, but his name Was introduced later in the Supplementary Statement. The disclosure of any means of involvement in the incident was recorded in the victim's statement, in which he stated that he suffered firearm injuries from the co-accused, attributing the general character to the suspect and co-accused. Had been injured in the fist, but there was no such injury. During the medical examination, the victim was found to have contradicted the medical evidence and the character of the accused on the face of the record was behind bars from 2006 to 2006, but in the near future there was no possibility of an end to the case. Until the illegal period, the accused will not be served any beneficial purpose in the prosecution, which, in such cases, was able to launch a further investigation. There was no ground for denial of the accused's bail, even under section 497 (4), before the final verdict could be granted, the CCP's bail could be granted, before the pistol was recovered from the accused. Was not enough because he did not use it during the event. The accused, in the circumstances, was admitted on bail jobs for fresh advocates from Kotla lawyer