Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus RAFI AHMAD

Section 24 West Pakistan General Clauses Act (VII of 1956), Sections 8 and 9 Pre-Literacy Case E-Som, Thirty-day Count Claim was filed by the Plaintiff on 26 2001 10 2001, before the Trial Court. Was presented on 27 10. 2001 when the order was approved for the collection of ar e, soem s within within days within ee days and the amount of e of ofem tor by amount was deposited by pre-emptor within within e within days. For thirty days through the pre-emptor, Plaintiff's administration was that it was a trial court's directive that it had to be complied with and that it could not be punished for doing so; it was necessary for the court to require pre-emptor. The court has introduced section 24 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act of 1991 for submission of 1/3 of the sale price of the property within the stipulated period; the court prevented the extension of the case for more than thirty days. Have given. The importer was fined by section 24 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Empty Act 1991 for the failure of the court to deposit the money within the prescribed period, the penalty was not for breach of any legal provisions but for section 24. Was for non-compliance with the court orders passed. The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991 of the Institute of Suits, 26 10 2001, had to be removed. The order of collection of goldsmith was also required to be exported, after the date of departure of the institution, the deposit was to be made within thirty days, ie equivalent to the date of visit from 27 10 2001 to 30 10 2001 and 1 11 2001 to 26. 11 Twenty-six days as of 2001, a total of thirty-two days, the Siam Jum, both were in accordance with the order of the trial court. The following were the set of legal orders and orders passed by the two courts and law websites from Bhuawana lawyer