SARDAR MASIH versus ANWAR SHAHZAD
A. XXXVII, Rr 1 and 2, where defendants appeared, were granted leave of defense claim, the written statement expressly refused to execute the pro note and even the cases were settled by the trial court. After the trial, the case was decided by the court. Opportunity for parties to include evidence in support of their claims despite the fact that the defendant acknowledged the implementation of the supporting note and receipt, if the defendant did not adhere to the evidence, the decree could not be passed in favor of it. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Rajanpur lawyer
