ALLAH DITTA versus SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 3, 5, 7 and 17 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for a lease agreement for sale of animals on a bidder who was successful bidder, his offer was accepted and he Instead, deposit the required amount to the authorities. Completing the contract with the applicant, re-advertising the auction on the basis that the applicant did not submit a pre-installment for the month of July, 2004 the applicant filed before the Tehsil Nazim that the authority deliberately leased the contract. Failure to implement, the auction not declared invalid without refund The applicant requested for the refund of his dues and other deposits that the Secretary Local Government, which has also been rejected, submitted. was done. The amount required for implementation of the lease agreement, but never implemented / completed under the turmoil that the applicant did not submit the installment for the month of July, the authority did not delay the applicant's claim. He was responsible for paying the advance installment only after the approval of the Tehsil Council's House in July 2004, which was silent on why it was never obtained, before the date of this July 2004 episode. That is, on the 5th of this month, the contract for the auction was announced and how the applicant was responsible for depositing the money. And by the so-called mistake, how all the money was confiscated, the Touchstone of the Punjab Local Government Rules 2003 could not be traced and instead the applicant's appeal authority records. Source
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
