Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus STATE

Sections 2302 (b) and 606060 of the evidence were benefited from the suspect overnight. The accused's name was not listed in the FIR Complainant and, the victim was not hostile to anyone as specifically in the FIR. Has been mentioned, and no one was suspected of the killer at that time. The victim's daughter and widow subsequently involved the accused in the case, the three witnesses made unambiguous improvements to the trial to reconcile their statements, which were presented by the victim's daughter and widow. The story was not objectionable and did not appeal. The delay of five hours in filing the FIR with the aforementioned weaknesses in the prosecution case shows that the FIR was lodged after the initial investigation into the suspect's identity by the victim's daughter and widow. It was not credible because it was not mentioned in the FIR, nor did it adequately describe its presence at night on the occasion of the RIR, a high place; even its flame, identity. The source was not captured by the police, the prosecution of the incident was not proved by the recovered rifle and the crime was blank, which was carried out on a single wire. I was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory is expected, this positive report on the laboratory can not be sure, because it is evidence of the possibility of counterfeiting can not be dismissed. All the evidence of the prosecution is stained. Making mistakes was better than committing a crime, the suspect was given the benefit of the doubt and he was acquitted. Accordingly law firms from Sahiwal lawyer