Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB ALIAS KALA versus STATE

Sections 2302 (b) and 9459 of the evidence were appreciated in the victim's home during mid-December. The assailants could not be identified as they were wearing masks and did not list their names for the first time in the FIR. Went to In his supplementary statement he introduced the purpose and also made clear the fact that he had identified the attackers as their masks were displaced during the clash to increase the prosecution's trial or the number of accused. The prosecution's witnesses failed to justify why they slept in the victim's home on the last day of the night and did not sleep in their own homes. The complainant also suppressed the fact that the FIR has stated that the deceased was living with his wife and sons, which was direct evidence, therefore, was not reliable. Medical evidence merely referred to the prosecution's case. It was supported to the extent that the victim lost his life due to the fireworks injuries, but could not help the attackers. The victim's post-mortem was examined more than twelve hours after the incident was reported. Police, who pointed out that the assailants did not know about the prosecution's testimony, did not result in the recovery of the pistols on the defendant's offer when the crime was vacated because of his absence. The recoveries also could not be proved by independent evidence. There was nothing but the motive, which was possibly presented on the advice of the investigating officer to strengthen the prosecution's case, which was full of doubts, He was acquitted under the circumstances registration advocate from Tharo Shah lawyer