Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANAF versus DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), FAISALABAD

Section 3 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Claiming that the property is vacant, claiming that it is a country in which non-Muslim property is owned. The non-Muslim sold his deceased father by a sale agreement before May 18, 1947, but due to sectarian outcry, said that the non-Muslim had emigrated to India and the seller under question had registered the contract. Could not be made, despite his best efforts, failed to change the land in his name in the relevant revenue records, the court said in Custodian Dalit resorted to and moved the petition under Section 22 of Pakistan (Advocate of Equality Property) Act, 1957, demanding that the land in the dispute be vacant and that its owner, Deputy Custodian, concluded that The sale of the foreclosure in interest was a genuine document and it declared that the land in the dispute was vacant which had been sold to the applicant in the interest of the applicant, Custodian confirmed the findings of the Deputy Custodian and Directed the authorities that orders filed under section 12 (2), under the CPC, under the Civil Court Instead of or compliance, to be precise record of the call made by the applicant to the authorities. Decisions and orders passed by Custodian and then by the civil court in favor of the applicant, which were said to have set aside the decisions and orders of the court on a collective basis. The petition was accepted and the decree passed in favor of the applicant was found earlier by the civil court famous lower court advocate from Sanghar lawyer