Find a Lawyer

KHURRAM versus STATE

Definition of Section 302 (b) evidence in this case occurred in the dark of night and there was a dispute between the co-accused and the victim before the interrogation and the accused had said that there was no participant in the alleged dispute. The accused was not even connected to the motivational part of the prosecution's story; there was a contradiction between the ocular account and the medical evidence. No crime was recovered on the spot, the investigating officer said, adding that the accused had no weapons and did not fire at the person who was killed. It did not show that there was a bulb, two tube lights were visible, without any scale in the site plan but they were far from the facts, both the prosecution witnesses who were closely related to the victim, made a dishonest improvement before the trial court. But their earlier statements were completely contested. Even as their statements contradicted each other, the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the suspects beyond any doubt in order to maintain the conviction, an appeal was allowed, the unclean verdict was set aside, the accused Was acquitted of the case and ordered to be released. immigration advocates from Sihala lawyer