Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 3 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intro Court of Appeal Allotment of Land Allotment Request Cancellation of Land filed in favor of the Respondent, stated that the cancellation was dismissed by the High Court. , The respondent Intro-Court Appeal, which was allowed by the High Court and the matter was remanded to the Member Board of Revenue for the notification of the notified officer, and the case approved by the notification officer decided that earlier The allotment was surrendered and the purchase by appellant was not only limited, but also confirmed. Was gone However, he was ordered to surrender to the remaining applicant Amad and, through an application, surrendered and gave details of his choice to surrender and retain the land. Accordingly, two changes were made in the name of the respondents and in the name of the respondents, the land was claimed by the appellant as stated in detail in the constitutional petition, the defendant did according to his choice. It was retained and removed in favor of the mutant by the appellant. Had raised no objection, and had never challenged intra-court. In connection with the approval of this change, the Appeal was granted on the power of the Syed Motion Notification Officer Appellant's order, without giving any challenge to the above change and on the basis of the orders to which the mutation was approved. , Cannot claim any right to purchase the property. The specified variable name top advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer