Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus MUMTAZ BEGUM THROUGH L.RS. ANAL OTHERS

Articles & 42 & Contract 54 Contract Act (72 I72 of 1872), Sections 182 & 202 Title The claim of sale by the lawyer in favor of the Principal and the Attorney Cell on the issue of this transaction is a shameful transaction at trial. The court dismissed the genuinely resigned lawyer because the appellate court also found the attorney's authority authoritative but allowed the appeal and dismissed the case in favor of the plaintiff only. The defendant and the buyer were brothers, the only reason being that the brother was sold by the defendant and could not be declared illegal and the defendants are required to present some evidence in such a way Failing to prove why the lawyer was given to the defendant, when there was no close relationship between them, the power of attorney was basically arrested but the two courts declared the correctness of the sale in real questions. Depended on the authenticity of the power of attorney, the plaintiffs failed in this regard it was not the case of the plaintiffs that their The agent was given a power of attorney and the buyer committed some fraud with them. The plaintiff sold the property to the plaintiff and his brother, and for this purpose the power of attorney was given the right that the statements of the witnesses presented by the plaintiff prove the fact that the defendant and his brother appellate court Testified about the sale of the property to. The case was subject to a jurisdictional error, which could not be retained and the order and consequently the judgment and order passed by the trial court were restored. top civil advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer