Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ALIAS ACHHU versus STATE

Section 302 (b) evidence was appraised over a broad day and was immediately reported to the police. The accused did not deny the incident, but made a special request that he be killed late. Is graved and made under sudden provocation. The incident, which is not mentioned in the FIR or in the first statements of witnesses, but on the record during cross-examination cannot be interpreted as contradictions, the presence of the victim's father / the victim's father at the time of the incident and Other witnesses were present. The accuser's false allegation against him that he had no motive or ill will against the accused was permanent, natural, coherent and convincing, which was supported by medical evidence as well as the murder of the late. I was suddenly provoked until he had suggested it in his statement, nor did he exclude this from proving a defense request, nor was he excluded from the circumstances of the trial, Nor was there any reasonable possibility of this being true. The accused had recovered from the sharp weapon of a 20-year-old boy repeatedly because of this and there was no mitigating circumstance in his favor. Accordingly, the death of the accused was confirmed top civil advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer