Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus MEER ASLAM JAN

A VII, R 10 and O XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 Courts of Reconciliation for recovery of Rs. 16,500 on the basis of Ordinance (XLIV of 1961), Section 6 and Schedule Part I, Section B suit, note note and Subsequent to the return of the plaintiff and the closure of his right to present evidence, it was raised before the Additional District Judge that the only court of reconciliation was authorized to hear such a case. Such a case is exclusively enforceable in connection with section B (civil cases) of section 6 (1). The plaintiff of the Part I Schedule to Conciliation Courts Ordinance, 1961, was not prohibited from taking such an objection at such a stage or delayed or delayed the objection of the objection to which the jurisdiction of the court was not That Additional District Judges cannot accept such jurisdiction. The actions taken without jurisdiction would be in the eyes of the law against a tent court ask a advocate free from Daska lawyer