Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324, 337a (ii) and 337l (ii) did not prove motive against the accused. During the course of the investigation, the police never arrested the accused who were found innocent and not cheated. was done. A complaint against the accused, however, was sought by the trial court to bring him to trial. There was no recovery from the accused. The incident occurred in the dark hours after sunset, but no light source was reported in the FIR or presented during the trial and the accused was, therefore, the prosecution's witnesses. Could not possibly be identified by. In the same case, six accused were acquitted on the same set of evidence. If an injured eye witness can lie, he cannot believe the aforementioned evil accused. There is no independent justification for his statement. The suspects were full of suspicion jobs for fresh advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer