Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ABBAS ALI

Section 42 Declaration for Sale Mutational Evidence Defendants sought to declare that the sale, in favor of the defendants, by the conversion of their foreclosure was the result of fraud and the approval of the petition before the relevant patwari and the petitioner. There was no dispute over the objective question. However, it was related to a consensus that was not paid, Patwari appeared, and he was dismissed that he had confirmed to the plaintiff / vendor that the presence of the interchange witnesses had been confirmed by the plaintiff / vendor. It was also noted that the record shows that some days after the approval of the question by the nephew and nephew of the predecessor, the defendants sold their respective land to the trial court. I believe the change was legal, valid and carefully considered the actions of the vendor facilitating further sales. For them, the land was not a matter of practice, which they had been cheated on a few days earlier, which they said had been verified or substantiated by the trial court's defendants' appeal. The fact of the matter, finding that there is no illegal or malicious act of any kind, cannot be interfered with by the High Court. immigration advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer