TASNEEM ISMAIL AND OTHERS versus MESSRS WAFI ASSOCIATES
Sections 12 and 35 Revoke the contract to sell the contract for specific performance The extension of time for not collecting the amount of the statute was decided in favor of the plaintiff under the consent decree, so the decedent transferred his rights to the third person Was transferred, therefore, the auxiliary and the decree holder sought permission to submit an unspecified amount but the trial court denied the High Court in exercise of the jurisdiction of the appeal and the accused was allowed to submit the deduction amount but the accused. Failed to deposit this amount, but the effective injunction has led to no termination Terms not submitted. In case of default, it had to be before the court order under section 35 of the Special Relief Act 1877 and the court still had the discretion to extend the time. Moved to the trial court, which was erroneously rejected and the High Court rightly set aside the trial court's decision and allowed the request of the plaintiff and the Assistant Assigne to create an error in payment of the purchase amount. , Therefore, his case fell under section 35 (c) of the Special Relief Act 1877 and in that case the contract was rescinded. The decision was dismissed by the High Court and the case filed by the plaintiff was dismissed. Appeal allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
