Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE THROUGH SECRETARY

Article 22 Advance Increase Appellant's Right to Improve Educational Qualification Improved, and under the Board's policy, the Board applying for an Advance Increment Grant refused to take advantage of Advance Increase on the basis that the Appellant The user has improved his or her educational qualifications without permission. The authority of the competent authority is an indispensable right of every individual, no one can be denied this right, yet to appear in the examination for official purposes. Despite the need for prior permission for, many in the educational qualifications without the permission of the relevant authorities Can not be punished for sure. The consequences of denying the benefits of a prior increment scheme to an employee who had improved his / her ability during the service, subject to the enforcement of the criteria and other conditions, if any, advanced by the Appellant Board Appellant's policy. Was entitled to give the increment was wrongly denied the benefit of the advance increment appeal was allowed solicitors from Goular Khel lawyer