MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN AND OTHERS versus IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN
Section 2 of the Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), Section 114 Land Acquisition Tenants 'Option Notification Officer, Appellants' jurisdiction was occupied by the tenants and was saddened by the allotment given by the Notified Officer in favor of the respondents. ? Section 114 (2) (b), the officer was retained by the provisions of the accuracy of the High Court of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, was sufficient to meet all such matters in such land as ivy. The portion of the land was 1/2 and the occupant for the rest of the residential area was considered the landlord. Such allotment could only be made by the notified officer as the revenue was a forum within the purview of the law. This notified officer had nothing to do with the correct interpretation of the provisions contained in 5 114 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887; Are entitled to allot the land under. Allotment was available, after satisfying their claim, that the appellants could refer to the relevant forum for all legal exceptions to the rest of the legal estate; the order approved by the notified officer was properly maintained by the judge in the High Court chamber. Kept Appeal dismissed by High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
