MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE
Eleven days of delay in filing the FIR was not verified, the 497 crime (enforcement of the Hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), sections 16 and 10 (3) bail, the question is whether The question about the marriage of the accused kidnappers took place with his free consent, could not be determined during the criminal proceedings and was the only forum family court for that purpose. It was not possible for the accused to establish their marriage, but the fact that the two girls denied their marriage with the accused after the rehabilitation of the complainant would not mean that the marriage claim was never made. Nothing happened, unless the Family Court reported the stay behind bars from 10 to 2006, after recording evidence from both sides. There, they cannot be expected to file a lawsuit in Family Court and get a verdict of this effect. arrest warrant, they were admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Mir Ali lawyer
