KHAWAJA MUKHTAR RASOOL versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Section 42 Punjab General Provident Fund Rules, 1978, RR 1 7 and 1 34 Punjab Government Servants Benefit Fund Ordinance, 1960, Sections 2 (a), 3 and 4 Punjab Government Employees \ Welfare Fund Ordinance (1 of 1969), Section 2 (A) Rules of the West Pakistan Government Employees \ Welfare Fund Rules, 1969, R11 suit claims as the candidate nominated to declare the mother of the plaintiff public servant as a Family Pension, Gratuity, General Provident. Under the payments associated with the fund, group insurance and other outstanding services will be received by the law husband, brothers and sisters of the deceased civil servant and the plaintiff on his death. Denied her position as a tree, while her husband also claimed to be fully entitled to the benefits of such service, during the time the husband applied for the plaintiff's rejection. Plaintiff's death Trial death due to request by brothers and sisters for their enforcement in the lawsuit as to the plaintiff's legal heirs (his mother) Without being the plaintiff, the Court of Appeal accepted the husband's appeal and directed him to work on the benefit of such services in accordance with the rules. According to the Shariah Trial Court, his legal heritage had to decide the following questions: (i) whether the plaintiff was a nominee? (ii) What will be the effect if the plaintiff has received proof of nomination? (iii) If the plaintiff was alive, he would not have been able to prove himself as a nominee, whether he was entitled to inheritance according to the Shariah, and if he died, would his legal heirs? Such facts for your decision about eligibility
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
