Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus STATE

The benefit of suspicion of Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 364 bail, grant of further investigations was not delayed for more than a month in the filing of the FIR nor the details of the alleged abduction methods. Neither witness name was mentioned in the FIR, but eight persons, including women, were listed in the FIR. Information about the kidnapping of the alleged abduction witness presented by the complainant during the investigation. Without disclosing, none of the suspects were involved in the search for the alleged kidnapping officer. The liar was reported for his abduction, but after the alleged abduction, the police arrested and charged the accused, his alleged abduction statement under Section 164, CCP disclosed. It was reported that the police did not recover the kidnapper from the accused's custody and records show that he was presented to the investigating officer by some patwari. All said that the facts made the case of the accused. After further investigation, the story of the prima fee prosecution was dashed, the benefit of the doubt could be given to the accused in the bailout phase, the accused was behind bars for a long time, Still some suspects had to be at the preliminary end of the trial; bail could not be prevented under the circumstances because the accused was admitted to bail under a punishment action, under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n top advocate from More kunda lawyer