MUHAMMAD AMIN BROTHERS (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR versus PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL STORAGE AND SERVICES CORPORATION LIMITED
Section 15 uses the term with the description of the sale \ where the inspection of the goods in connection with the supply of goods, when the relevant proof is not available, was given by the defendant to the contract for the sale of the special rice rice. But the appellant sued for the specific performance of the contract, claiming that with damages and a security refund, it did not meet the details stated in the agreement between the rice parties. Plus more than the amount deposited by the defendant should be deposited in it The defensive amount held by the respondents was that they were sold / therefore, on the same basis, therefore, the respondents were not obliged to complete the details of the rice given in the contract, partly by the trial court. Had rendered the suit partial, claim of performance and damages not allowed The appellant's suit was completely dismissed by the appellate court. Ounce for record of oral and documentary evidence is on record to prevent the matter from claiming that the case was not properly dismissed but did not present any evidence that the appellant had jointly The defendant was repeatedly offered for inspection and survey. According to the agreement, the rice was made according to which special rice was not available, but no such offer was made. Accepted by the Respondents `Basmati Special Rice was leaned more than six times in the contract document to suspect that the contracted rice sold through the description.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer