MANSIB ALI versus STATE
Section 2 30b (b) was giving controversial statements benefiting from the testimony of the suspect, more than six hours after the incident was registered. The case was not registered at the police station. There were inherent doubts about the matter that was filed after the debate. And the counseling medical evidence did not support the prosecution's version, witnesses did not see the incident that was not proven by an independent witness, five years after the incident, the gun was found on the defendant's offer. Which was hidden in the open space. And the job was never sent to a specialist for determination whether it was in a working order or not associated with an independent witness retrieval process. Such recovery was not viable. Accordingly, the evidence was not a significant part of the evidence, hence the conviction could not be based on such evidence that it was alleged that the suspect was taken advantage of and the circumstances were bad. Done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer