MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR MEHMOOD versus THE STATE THROUGH FIA
Section 22 (b) Demanding or receiving money for the provision of foreign employment The definition of the record of evidence proved that on the passport of persons affected for employment abroad, together with the compulsion of the accused, his comrades and others. Arranges false / fraudulent guards, clearances / registrations and visas. Evidence of the witnesses / victims was supported by the retrieval of his passport from the suspect's possession, when the alleged counsel, who was an independent witness at the time of his arrest, supported the prosecution's case in his evidence. The evidence was corroborated by the official evidence of the FIA, who arrested the accused and recovered passports. All told that the witnesses were examined at length, but the defense lawyer failed to break their evidence, or failed to extract material contradictions to create a contradiction in the case when the raiding team arrived. And the preparation of the consultation, being of a minor nature, would not be fatal to the prosecution's witnesses, the victims were victims / victims, natural and reliable witnesses, without any hostility to the accused. The witness's testimony clearly charged each and every material character, the prosecutor alleged that he did not have a license to send to anyone. Abroad, they were losing enough money on the pretext of providing employment to these people, the accused were convicted under Section 22 (b) under the Immigration Ordinance 1979, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013