Find a Lawyer

FIDA HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 2 302/34 Q Definition of Qatil-e-Amir and Joint Intent Evidence against the accused was that he committed the murder of the brother of the accused along with the co-accused, Section 2 34 34, statement of the accused under CRPC The confessional statement, pistol recovery, stimulus and positive chemical report provided by him were not recorded in his statement recorded under Section 342, CR in the trial court before the accused in the trial court. ? The accused was not sustained under the law and the conviction and sentence recorded against him were set aside and the trial under section 342, CR PC again, to record the statement of the accused and give a verdict within a month. Was sent to court.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• SALFI TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT OF KARACHI through D.C.O. 2013 CLD 2120
• Syed MANSOOR SADIQ ZAIDI v. Mst. BEGUM NARJIS ZAIDI 2013 YLR 2122
• KHURRAM BIN HASSAN v. IQRA FATIMA BAIG 2013 YLR 2137
• MEEZAN BANK LIMITED v. FOCUS APPARELS (PVT.) LTD. 2013 CLD 2138
• MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR MEHMOOD v. The State through FIA 2013 YLR 2155
• COMPANIES ORDINANCE, 1984 FOR CONFIRMING THE REDUCTION IN CAPITAL 2013 CLD 2156
• HAKIM ALI v. State 2013 YLR 2169
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. ABDUL WAHEED SIDDIQUI 2013 YLR 2181

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

list of advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes