GHULAM RASUL versus KHAN MUHAMMAD
Section 115 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), amendment of section 13 evidence misinterpreted the decision of pre-emption suit but the order was dismissed. Given that Witness A was the son of another witness and that his statements contained contradictions, although witness A's father's name and other witness's name were similar, it is noteworthy that witness A was 50 years old while the witness's age was 60 years, so, obviously, he was not a father-son. May take the decision before the appellate court shall not be deemed a victim of pending cases.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Sherani lawyer
