Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD SUMMA versus TOWN NAZIM, GULBERG, LAHORE

Section A 54A, & 195 & Sched & Schedule VI Punjab Agricultural Product Markets Ordinance (XXIII of 1978), Sections 3, 7 & 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Option to Allow Restoration of Public Buildings The controversial question was that the Petitioner wanted to build shops behind the fruit and vegetable market as being the Market Committee, but the Town Nazim objected to the construction on the basis that the residents of this area also requested the people to build this building. Objected to. Justification was not delegated to the Market Committee or any other authority within the parameters of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001; the Market Agreement failed to identify any clause in the Punjab Agricultural Product Markets Ordinance, 1978. Was also given the option. There was no provision by the Committee for the erection or erection of buildings in the Punjab Agricultural Production Markets Ordinance, 1978, or the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001, to indicate that the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, And the provisions of section 54A of Schedule V do not apply to the place where a market was established. The Punjab Agricultural Product Markets Ordinance, 1978, before the shops were opened or reopened by the Market Committee, obtained consent and permission under Section 5A and Schedule VI of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001 The residents suffered problems because of this. The area was a matter which could not be decided by the High Court as it was not only found in the controversial fact. family advocate from Ugoki lawyer