SADDAR HUSSAIN THROUGH L.RS. versus DOST MUHAMMAD
Under section 47 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 from which the registered document would operate, Landlund contracted to sell the property to the claimant by performing the sale deed. Landlady was unable to file a sale in favor of the respondents, amid the litigation. The parties and consequently the sale proceedings were filed. During the litigation, the landlord separated from the same ownership in favor of the appellants through another registered sale deed. The defendant, who was referred in favor of the appellant / subsequent vendors, requested that the illegal appellants request that they be sued by the suit property for valuable consideration without notice. Although their sale contract was executed after the seller's process but was previously executed by the defendant in favor of the defendant, but the respondents' cell deed was registered before registration, The transfer in favor of the plaintiff will be the case for the sale filed in favor of the plaintiff. The decision was made in favor of the respondents as well as the respondents, the appellants filed the second appeal of section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, provided that a registered document is run from the time it commences or on that date. From whether it will be implemented or not. From the date of its registration; it was the day of execution of the registered sale deed, nor the date of its registration which would determine its effectiveness in executing the sale deed in respect of the suit in dispute with the defendant. In the past, similar sales processes would dominate. The appellant was then hanged in his favor. Madam
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Chak Sheza lawyer