Find a Lawyer

ZAMEER AKRAM versus INAYAT

Section 8 Property Exchange Act (I82 of 1882), Section 118 In the recovery and transfer of possession, the defendants did not enter into their agreement for exchange and in return failed to transfer their land, to the defendants. The plea submitted was that instead of transferring their land to the plaintiff, the two courts together decided the case for the integrity of the plaintiff. Was a mutual transfer of ownership if the transfer of ownership by only one party and transfer of such transfer by the other, Because there was no mutual exchange. Transfer of property cannot be exchanged between property and money as it is on sale basis, as defined by section 44 by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 to the plaintiff who changed his agricultural land in the name of the claimant. If the defendant failed to transfer the agreed-upon land, the plaintiff was rightfully entitled to take back his land through the trial court and the appellate court high court. Refused to interfere with decisions and decree under the amendment by two courts was dismissed in the circumstances immigration advocates from Chishtian lawyer