Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM MATILA versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL BODIES ELECTION, 2005

R7S Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Jurisdictional Dispute Fresh elections at a polling station The decision of the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction was decided on remand of principles during polling violence and a voter's After the selected trial, the tribunal set aside the election results and re-polled the order at a polling station where violence took place, the issue of justification that was settled by people's desire for violence. But the facts were not disputed. No further investigation was needed No r. The Election Tribunal had, on the other hand, excluded the other matter concerning the need for a further verdict by it; the High Court did not exercise its constitutional jurisdiction with the subordinate tribunal or authority where such The decision of the decision involves decisions on questions which are not decided by a tribunal or authority. Or Dung of the most recent evidence to be investigated or re-examined was given with the jurisdiction to ensure that justice is in accordance with any law and that litigation concludes instead of seeking a remand of the case and In this way, the parties were refused to remand the case for further suspension of legal proceedings. The Election Tribunal's decree was amended to the extent that the entire election for the seat of the moderator and vice-president of the Union Council was amended. Declared, the High Court has directed that new appointments be made for the post of moderator and deputy. Will be talked to According to top civil advocates from Mir Ali lawyer