NOSHEEN HAMEED versus BANK OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
The applicant for the section 44 writ petition appointment, responding to the advertisement for the post of Grade III officers in the bank, stated that the applicant not only qualified for the written examination, but also interviewed candidates including petitions, rather than senior officials. Also received the award. In this regard, the petitioner decided to conduct his written test in order to obtain the written test in accordance with the procedure, so that the authorities should instruct the authorities to refrain from taking fresh written examination for the post. Was done if the earlier written test was not taken properly. By bank, it was then the bank's fault and not the applicant's fault. After conducting the written test and announcing the candidates' results, the bank wanted to conduct a fresh written test, no one could be punished for the executive's act. After announcing the result of a judicial or sub-judicial authority written test, the bank, the prime fee, waived its right to free sh writing examination because it was against the principles of natural justice and law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
