Find a Lawyer

BAQA MUHAMMAD KHAN versus KH. ZAFFAR IQBAL

Sections 6, 14, 20A, 21 and 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 66 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 6, without prejudice, as a superior rights seller. The Improvement Pre-emptor claimed that he was a co-owner of the suit, that he had a preferential right to purchase the suit land when he was Wendy on the suit's land, becoming a shareholder in the suit land because of the settlement agreement. had gone. Respect for another piece of land, which was part of the same woman's trial court, came after the necessary action, finding that the seller had improved his position. The pre-emptor was not entitled to any order and the appellate court rejected the case in favor of the pre-jumper, stating that the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Predatory Purchase Act, 1993 After the amendment, the decision of the appellate court was maintained as a shopkeeper after the amendment was not allowed in the form of Section 20A. The High Court Legislature enforced the provisions of Section 20A in the advance purchase act, 1993b. In order to protect the right to premature copyright. The pre-emptor, who had a legal right and was obliged by the courts to fully enforce the wisdom of the legislature, especially the laws that were enacted to uphold the rule of the pre-empire, However, the order was obtained when Section 20A of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Preferred Purchase Act, 1993b was already in the field when the seller had improved his position, only the rights of the shopkeeper could be protected. They had become fit. In the form of an order or otherwise before the law is issued advocate from Kacha Khooh lawyer