Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKMAL KHAN versus STATE

Sections 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 468, 471, 420 and 489F, are contained within the grant parties of the four-year FIR grant filed against the accused / applicant alleging that he participated. The complainant with the accused told the complainant that on payment, the government land would be allotted to him. The complainant alleges in the FIR that the land was not allotted despite payment of money to the accused, and when the matter was reported to the panchayat, the complainant handed over the complainant's checks which would later be made to the complainant. The accused was further alleged that the accused also issued a fake receipt to the bank regarding deposit of land allotment in favor of him, the arrest warrant was dropped by the post-trial court, the accused claimed. There has been a four-year delay in filing an FIR. That the check and allotment letter were not signed in favor of the complainant and also on the bank's recovery. The complainant himself was involved in the case registered under section 489F, after the PPC litigation, the case was registered against the accused and the accused under section 468, 471 and 420, the PPC was later Under sections 468 and 471, the offense was included. The PPCs were illicit receipts which do not sign the accusations of the accused against the accused under Articles 6868, 1, 471 and 202020 issued by the bank, in the prohibited clause of PPC section 7497 Does not appear, the PRC Complainant himself was involved in the case filed under Section 9489F, PPC. This shows that there was a litigation between the parties which was alleged divorce advocates from Sahiwal lawyer