Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ versus STATE

The testimony of sections 302 (b) / 149, 324/149 and 148 of the testimony of the suspect was not presented by the prosecution of the two main injured free-eye witnesses and the eyewitness testimony was presented by closely related witnesses who were unfaithful against the accused. Ar was listed in the police station on the spot and not in the prosecution case where discussions, consultations and deliberations were being conducted that led to the removal of the land, which was neither presented to the police nor prosecuted. During the hearing, who damaged the prosecutor's case that happened overnight. , Either no source of light was mentioned in the FIR or was presented during the trial, which also went against the prosecution, with the main suspect causing fatal fatal injury to the victim. Yes, he was still absconding, no crime was recovered on the 30 bore spot, there was no benefit to recover the crime weapon from the accused, eyewitnesses do not necessarily tell the whole truth. As a cousin, the possibility of her being trapped in this case cannot be ruled out. Suspect was taken advantage of and the suspect was acquitted. property advocate from Sibi lawyer