MST. SHEHAR BANO THROUGH HER HUSBAND versus MST. BADRUNNISA AND 5 OTHERS
The defendants were admitted at the time of contract execution and sale of the outstanding contract in suits 22, 12 and 54 of the contract's specific performance, damages and injunction, while the property was deferred. And his five sons were required to perform another sale by the parties, which failed to provide the defendant with photocopies of title documents, enabling the plaintiff to proceed with the registration of defects. That was actually the responsibility of the defendant Ones. To prove that the plaintiff had violated the terms of the agreements, after the merger of the agreements that were not excluded from the evidence of the defendant, it was demanded by the defendant that the terms of the action Will not fulfill its pledges, then the contract of sale cannot be finalized, there was a breach of the terms of the agreement which had effect that the defendant was retained in the suit \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Ghari Dupatta lawyer
