Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE ALIAS BHOLA versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (c)) Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt, to prove his case against the accused, the declaration of the deceased, for the last time, additional criminal conviction of the accused, on the evidence of the recovery of the crime articles in the accused's case. The deceased's statement did not disclose the identity of the suspect, who was hurt, which did not help the prosecution's case in part of the evidence when the last-time witness did not appear. Was present when the FIR was registered, though he attended the funeral of the late and the police personnel were present at that time, but the witness said A statement was never made to the police at that time and after 10/12 days of the incident, the police station recorded its statement under Section 161, CR PC. Delay; Last time the authenticity of the evidence of the witness was confused, even in the absence of any proof of any evidence, the last seen evidence was of no legal significance because of the alleged additional evidence before the witness. The accused had no opportunity to commit a judicial confession, neither had any deep connection with the complaining party nor understood it. The complainant was not in a position to express his influence on the party, nor was the statement of pardon given to the accused, saying that the witness had made any promise of any assistance to the accused. I was absolutely silent. After hearing the confessional statement, the witness said, he never tried to apprehend the accused on the spot, nor did he raise the attention of the passengers. online advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer