MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE
Section 498 Crimes Crimes (Enforcement of Hood) Ordinance (VIII of 1979), guaranteed before Section 7 arrest, the accused's grant was an old man, while the co-accused was another female co-accused who was the complainant's son and one's son. After the arrest, the accused was allowed to bail. During the two investigations, the accused was found innocent, a report was prepared and even recommended that the case be canceled. The eight stripes were accused of being innocent in the eyes of the law. Section 497 (2), the prosecution had a duty to prove the offense against those found not guilty under the CRPC prohibition clause, and with the fact that no imprisonment was awarded , Stripes cannot be punished under the provisions of the law and as expected, interim pre-arrest bail was already allowed by the accused, it has been confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Bhalwal lawyer