NAWAB DIN ALIAS BABU versus STATE
Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 435 bail, the grant of the charges against the accused was that he, along with the accused, burnt the wheat crop belonging to the complainant, an unexpected delay of four days. The FIR was in the filing and the accused was entitled to benefit. The same FIR reported that the co-accused was also present at the scene at the time, but during the interrogation, he found the innocent suspect had been in judicial custody for a long time but had not yet investigated any of the prosecution's witnesses. Was gone The accused did not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497;
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mangal Sada lawyer
