Find a Lawyer

ABID LATIF versus RAO ABDUL JABBAR KHAN

Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 of the Complaints Regulation (sections XLV of 1860), sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 were dismissed by the private complaint petition challenging the order under which sections 302, 324, under the PPC. Private complaint was filed under Sections 148 and 149, which was approved by the trial court after the trial court consciously applied for the mind, three defendants were not registered in the trial and their Was refused, and the other accused named in the complaint were already summoned. It is a waste of time and effort to seek a private complaint by seeking them again in the case of the state and after not fulfilling any useful purpose, especially when the prosecution's story was similar in the case of the complaint. ? There was no trial court's opportunity against the same accused who was summoned in the state case to refer to a post-mortem report or a medico legal repo. rts because there was no anarchy against it. All three respondents said it hurt because otherwise, during the preliminary inquiry, the court did not have to enter into the realm of deep appreciation of the evidence available on record. This will not replace the search. The trial court's illegal ruling was absolutely legal and did not demand any interference by the High Court. top civil advocates from Ubaro lawyer