IMRAN RAZA versus STATE
Sections 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 406 and 420, guarantees of the defendants submitted that their non-bailable warrants were never received or offered, resulting in inadmissible An order was issued to issue a bail warrant, which in turn led the High Court to approve the security bail, given the fact that both the complainant and the accused were residents of the place as well as the alleged incident. Due to the direct filing of the complaint was also filed directly of K, the complaint came to the place with the intention of the accused, the security guard to the accused. The results were approved, in which case Saeed's guarantee would be valid for a period of ten days or until the accused surrendered himself before the trial court, whichever was earlier \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Shahkot lawyer
