AJAL KHAN versus BAHARUDDIN KERIO
Rejection of Section 200 Direct Complaint Direct Complaint under Section 200, the CCP was dismissed by the trial court because entry 20 in the relevant police station had clearly disclosed that the accused accused by the police party. The action taken to seize was a justified action. The applicant alleged that the trial court ignored all the evidence included by the applicant in the preliminary inquiry proceedings and even 4/5 other persons by the raiding police party in entry number 21. The arrest was disclosed to the Additional Advocate General, who, while refusing to face these facts, was unable to confirm that the illegal arrest of 4/5 other people was by policemen, who carried out the raid. In the middle of the party, the facts show that the material was brought on record. In order to bring their complaint under Section 200 by the applicant, the workers against the CCP said that the rulers complain under this order, dismissed with the directive to take further action in the matter according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Alipur lawyer