Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, HOUSING AND TOWN PLANNING, SINDH SECRETARIAT, KARACHI


O XXXIX, Reform Ordinance for RR 1 and 2 (XII of 1972), abolish the status of section 3 intra-court appeal plots, along with the grant of the appellant who filed the specific performance of the contract, O XXIX with the claimant, The petition was filed under Rr. 1 and 2. In order to approve the classification and restraining order, the CPC stated that the petition was dealt with by the High Court on the observation that the appellant had in his favor a balance for dismissal. Was unable to be disclosed, however respondents have been advised. , Had said that the government had abandoned the idea of wasting its plots in question. The High Court ruled that the respondents would maintain the status of the plots in question as per the statement of the counsel of the respondents till the disposal of the suit, which was to be decided within the stipulated time. Accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Samma Satta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.