Find a Lawyer

NASEEM AHMED SEHAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Article 199 tender for constitutional construction; so that he may have a chance to participate in the tender according to the latest advertisement. Petitioner alleged that in the absence of such an exercise, he was responsible for keeping all the transactions separate. The tender documents revealed that the work was based on the preparation of the estimates. At the rate of the running contracts, which were generally subject to variations in the drawing revision even at the time of implementation, the final payment was always based on work and was recorded in the measurement record, which was estimated at cost. Different amounts appear in comparison. The statement made after the bid has been received will not affect merit in any way, so that the applicant or another contractor will face discrimination. It was merely a comparative statement that was made with regard to the rates prepared by the bidders before the tender was opened. Such questions did not need to be settled in the use of the constitutional petition. The constitutional application was dismissed. ask a advocate free from Lodhran lawyer