Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AIJAZ versus DIRECTOR CUSTOMS

Sections 2 (s), 26, 156 (1) (8) (77) (89) (90), 168 and 171 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner seizes the applicant in relation to the vehicle, which is the legal owner The vehicle, which was claimed to be located, was said to produce the imported documents of this vehicle, but was unable to present the registration book vehicle except after giving notice of the detention and preparing the necessary consultation. Was. Subsequently notice was given to the applicant for the preparation of legal import documents under Section 26 of the Customs Act 1969 but no document was submitted by the applicant, the vehicle under the customs Act, 1969 The confiscation officer found that the applicant submitted the documents, not concluding that the vehicle was legally imported, such an observation was made on the basis of a naturally produced substance, However, a final inquiry was not yet made by the Adjudication Officer, who has already issued show cause notice to the applicant. He was. The applicant should, in conjunction with the Department's Adjustment Officer, adopt the initiative. The High Court had directed that a proper hearing be given to the applicant and the case should be decided in strict order as per the law. jobs for fresh advocates from Pasroor lawyer