IMTIAZ versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) / Cri 34 Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Valuation of Section Evidence Evidence Evidence The legal heirs of one of the deceased have compromised the accused, to the extent of the appeal of the accused and reference to the murder. The decision was made by the Division Bench. On the basis of the settlement, the High Court's immediate FIR filing revealed that the accused was armed with Kalashnikov, while the co-accused (declared guilty) was also armed with Kalashnikov when they both shared their common words. Were. The accused was sentenced to death for murder of two innocent persons, but he agreed with the deceased's legal heirs. ? The accused was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of another accused, after which he was convicted. Such incident went against accused 34, PPC fully applicable in this case. Was because he committed the killing of two innocent people, after killing the accused with his co-accused. His life was fully maintained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer