UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR versus DR. AZEEMUDDIN ZAHID
Section 7 University of Health Sciences, Regulations, Regular No. 7 (a) to (f) Punjab Office of Ombudsman Act (XX 1997), Section 10 (9) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for re-examination. Regarding the marks on the application response document, the University of Chicago has directed the Ombudsman to submit the applicant's response papers to the University, rejecting the application, whether the University of Health Sciences, Lahore Regulation No. 7 (a) to (f), the specific powers granted to them under the terms of office 10 (9) of the Ombudsman Act, 1997 In view of this, justifications used by the University artist can be used to determine that each question has been passed only to the fact that each question is in fact attempted to be examined and marked. Was gone, and there was no math error in the total numbers table. The Ombudsman can check the response documents for such a limited purpose. Clearly in a Supreme Court case which is in accordance with the law of the Supreme Court which according to SCMR 676 Constitutional application was directed against the interlocutory order in 1996, the High Court dismissed the constitutional application under the circumstances. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
