Find a Lawyer

BARI RICE MILLS LTD. versus PASSCO

Sections 15, 16 and 36 where there is contract In this case, the scope employment employed in the contract, is clearly proof that the seller's adoption of the term \ where is \ is merely excluded from his obligations. Keeping the agreed quantity of goods in the supply condition - as it is - only in relation to the supply of goods was applied to the terms of the contract and in no way, could the seller be liable for the supply Did not The agreed standard of goods is the effect of the term only as used in the contract. Section 36 (5), of the Goods Act, 1930, was to transfer the burden to the buyer which means the term was given \ Must be determined on the basis of the context in which this term is used. As if where \ was not capable of a complex meaning when the quality of the goods supplied by the seller did not meet the description given in the contract, the buyer could not be blamed for not carrying the goods. Was. The seller could not benefit from the principles of section 16 (2) of the contract description and the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. immigration advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer