MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT PRESIDENT\'S SECRETARIAT, ISLAMABAD
Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (ii) (Iiv), 5 and 6 misunderstandings, the authorized charge recommended the penalty of the authorized retirement authority, while the dismissal of the job did not offend the government employee. Notices were given, nor was the recorded reason for disagreement with the penalties suggested by the competent authority contrary to the prescribed principles of criminal justice, thus not sustainable in law. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
