SAJID versus STATE
Sections 302 (b) and 452 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) occurred in the daylight in the courtyard of the home of the victims, the eyewitnesses were the inmates of the house in all of this incident. There were more natural witnesses and despite being related to the deceased but not having any hostility or malice against the accused, they were quite independent witnesses, despite the slightest contradictions and contradictions in the prosecution, from medical evidence, motivation and attendance to the eyes. The testimony of the witnesses was substantiated that the circumstances of this case were incomprehensible, eyewitnesses cannot be expected to measure the exact distance and There was no importance of any kind of contradiction in explaining the distance; finding the harmony of the two courts below the accused's guilt was not a misdemeanor or a leave to read evidence or to appeal a material defect. The accused was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Chaininda lawyer