Find a Lawyer

LAL WAZIR versus MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR

In order to cancel sections 1 561A and 6 516A the Superior Petition of Order, the applicant requested the cancellation of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, under which the Judicial Magistrate's order regarding `Supddri regarding the motor car The plaintiff's application for review was approved and the motor vehicle recovered by the police was recovered, the police recovered the village from a deserted place, and not from the possession of the applicant's agreement. The request was provided by the applicant in connection with the purchase of the vehicle and the fake document was with the author. In the case the FIR refused to write the stamp paper in connection with the purchase of the vehicle, it is also true that no competing claimant in the FIR, the vehicle registration number was mentioned and the applicant's name I was not involved, with regard to the FA, the applicant's quest cannot be considered a good ground for proving ownership of the order, the CTS and the circumstances of the matter were in accordance with the law, which could not be interfered with and In any case, the so-called intervention to give rise to interference was not found to be a legal or legal jurisdictional error. And it was removed famous high court advocate from Chitral lawyer