DIRECTOR-GENERAL FWO, RAWALPINDI CANTT versus SHOUKAT ALI
Arts 87, 117 and 118 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VI, R 15 Evidence of Certified Copies of Documents to Suit Cases Onus Trial Court Dismisses This Case, First Appellate Court Demands Limitations and Reasons To prove this case. The case for action is always on the plaintiff, but in the present case the defendant was mistakenly barred from the partner, which is why no credible evidence from both sides was brought to the record as a problem of a mixed question of law and facts. Due to this it was not possible to issue the limit. Decided that there was not enough material available on file until the magistrate first authenticated the documents of the documents which were certified by the Magistrate's First Class, who apparently did not have access to the original documents nor to confirm it. , Did not meet the qualifications listed in the Article. The law was therefore not admissible in evidence, even in the evidence of the evidence of the evidence of the Plaintiff was not valid and was in sync with the O. VI, R 15, CPC court points below. Failure to admire and adopt appropriate procedures, nor for the parties to advise that the courts properly assisted, in the circumstances the case was presented to the civil judge for a de novo trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
